10 Brilliant Social Psychology Studies
Any student of humanity should be familiar with these "10 Brilliant Social Psychology Studies ". This list comes from PsyBlog. While I'm generally disappointed with Internet science popularization, this blog seems like it provides a good entry point to psychological studies. Several of these studies are relevant to the topics we discuss here, but three were particularly interesting to me:
- War, Peace and the Role of Power in Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment
: This study (inadvertantly) investigated the dynamics that can result when a powerful group tries to manipulate less powerful groups. I hope that our guys in Iraq have considered these dynamics.
- Why We All Stink as Intuitive Psychologists: The False Consensus Bias
: Many (most? all?) people assume that their own thinking is representative of human thinking in general, and tend to think poorly of others who disagree.
- How to Avoid a Bad Bargain: Don't Threaten
: Humans don't always act as "utility maximizing agents" (at least if you define "utility" as being independent of others in society) even when they are playing a simple game where they are instructed to maximize their score. This basically found that people exhibited spiteful behavior against others playing the game.
My first thought on these studies is that they illustrate particular personalities, and not necessarily some immutable aspect of human behavior. In the "false consensus" study, the subjects apparently assumed that others thought like they did, yet I'm familiar with a number of people who tend to assume that they think differently than others -- that they are "ahead of the curve" and others tend to hold wrong opinions. Similarly, not everyone is inherently competitive or spiteful. Many people really just care about their absolute wealth, not their relative wealth. I think that many libertarians have this perspective ("self-centered" if you will), and have trouble understanding that others are fundamentally competitive ("status seeking"). Sometimes, "mental socialists" criticize "self-centered" individuals for not having intrinsic concern for their fellow man, while ignoring that "mental socialism" often takes nasty forms, such as spite and hyper-competitiveness.
Any view of human society needs to take into account the extent that people are driven by these different psychological tendencies.
Cross posted to Freedom Democrats
- adam ricketson's diary
- Login or register to post comments

Comments :
Good diary Adam
I am surprised that you are not getting more comments, but still, this is a good set of references.
Think the SC group suffers from False Consensus Bias much? xD
Seriously, though, on average, we are indeed probably less biased than the general population.
"The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." --R. Heinlein
Naturally I would have highlighted different ones...
the Stanford Prison experiment, the Milgram experiment, and the Asch conformity study (all of which are listed on the site you link).
I find those the most interesting, personally, because they form a basis of a lot of my own beliefs about anarchism.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
important, yes
The main reason I didn't list those is that I was already familiar with them and consequently figured that they were more well-known.
I'd guess that you would also be interested in studies of Stockholm syndrome or how American POWs were persuaded to cooperate with their North Korean captors. I guess these are case studies rather than controlled studies, so they didn't make this list...and they seem to exhibit some of the dynamics revealed by these studies.
In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.