The Debate Obama Cannot Win

Barack Obama losing his lead in the battlefield states of Pennsylvania, Colorado, Ohio, and Florida - and the electoral college count as well today, I found this article spot on as to why.

Barack Obama's campaign for the presidency is faltering mostly because he misrepresented himself to the American people. He promised new and authentic politics; unity and bipartisanship; and reform of Washington. He touted his impeccable judgement — as evidenced by his early opposition to the Iraq war and the surge. He thus set the terms of the election debate. Yet the very terms he established are the ones he cannot win with. His record simply does not correspond to his rhetoric.

Mr. Obama's "new kind of politics" - which was based on telling the truth, being a principled politician and treating one's opponents fairly - collapsed once he secured the nomination in June. He reversed course with dizzying speed on NAFTA, FISA, public financing of campaigns, whether the D.C. gun ban was constitutional, meeting with rogue leaders without preconditions and the unity of Jerusalem. He even qualified his Iraq policy by stating it would be "refined" according to "conditions on the ground." Most recently, in light of the economic downturn, Mr. Obama stated he might reconsider implementing the tax increases in his economic plan.

Mr. Obama appeared authentic during the Democratic campaign as a liberal champion: In running to the left of Hillary Clinton, he was passionate, fiery and convincing. Yet since his mad dash to the center, he appears uncomfortable: He stammers and stutters in response to questions rather than speaking forthrightly. The polished, Ivy League-educated senator now uses "folksy" expressions. This downhome speaking manner is geared toward attracting white, blue collar voters - and is not in consonance with his impeccable oratory. He is now packaged and artificial.

Here is the rest of the story.

Comments :

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And there seems to be no question...

...but that John McCain is the most able to garner bi-partisan support .

Back in the thirties we were told we must collectivize the nation because the people were so poor. Now we are told we must collectivize the nation because the people are so rich.” ~ William F. Buckley, Jr.


…………

A standard, partisan Washington Times editorial

Naturally, you agree with this one-sided assessment that seizes on all Obama failures, real and media-imagined, and looks at each of them in the most unflattering light.  Meanwhile, none of the postitives which Obama brings to the table are mentioned at all.

Can you possibly claim that an equivalent list of McCain gaffes, flip-flops, foibles, inconsistencies, and stylistic grievances could not be compiled?  

…………

It was presented as a rationale of why Obama is losing...

...therefore it would be nonsensical to include whatever facts you think are "positive"?

I see nothing there as being "Media Imagined"? And I think it looks at it in the light of day, flattering or not.

I think a list of McCain's would be far more streamlined. ;-)

Back in the thirties we were told we must collectivize the nation because the people were so poor. Now we are told we must collectivize the nation because the people are so rich.” ~ William F. Buckley, Jr.


………… parent

I wish.

I really wish that political fortunes were decided by substantive issues, but the sad truth is they aren't. Obama is losing because he's running a fairly mediocre campaign as evinced by the serious misstep of not choosing a femal VP (which McCain capitalized upon). McCain is doing a better job of running a circus meant to get people's attention. Nothing more meaningful than that.

And I say that as someone who has no love for either candidate.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

Look I'm rooting for McCain,

but I think its a stretch to say Obama's losing. He's certainly not doing as well as one might expect considering the circumstances, but the race is well within the margin of error in national polls, and no candidate reaches 270 without winning states that are in the MOE.

………… parent

Good point

I said that badly. It isn't that Obama is losing (in the sense of clearly going to lose the election) but that he's been trending down. He's losing his edge or advantage.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent