Radicals; On Your Marks!
We are facing the abyss.
Even if Paulson's package does get passed by Congress, there is still a chance that our financial system will fail. As President Bush described the risk :
More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock
market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your
retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures
would rise dramatically.And if you own a business or a farm, you
would find it harder and more expensive to get credit. More businesses
would close their doors, and millions of Americans could lose their
jobs.Even if you have good credit history, it would be more
difficult for you to get the loans you need to buy a car or send your
children to college. And, ultimately, our country could experience a
long and painful recession.
He calls it a "recession", but it sounds more like a "depression" to me (he didn't even mention the issue of demand contraction).
Americans are scared about the economy. They are trying to figure out what went wrong, and how to protect themselves. This is exactly the time when economic radicals have a chance to make their case. So please, take this opportunity to make your case.
So far, the debate has been limited to a few groups who basically support the economic status quo. Their responses are summed up as:
- Markets are prone to abuse: They'd establish greater government oversite, as a matter of course
- Government distorts the market: They'd remove institutions that obscured the basic problems.
- People make mistakes: They look at this as a more general learning experience that reveals the need for adjustments to both regulatory and private decision making.
Their shared perspective is that they want to maintain the basic structure of our financial and economic system. However, some of us believe that the basic structure is inherently crisis prone, and none of these status quo solutions will do anything more than buy time. From that perspective, what I want to hear are proposals to change the basic rules governing our financial and economic systems. If you support any of such proposals, now is the time to write it up and spread it around; if radical proposals can't gain any traction over the next few years, then they won't gain any traction in our lifetime.
So here's my challenge to radicals: start making proposals for basic legal reforms or new economic institutions that regular people can understand, and make an argument for how these reforms will avoid future economic crisis. These proposals should describe the mechanism by which wealth will be allocated to high-return investments (the basic needs for a productive life among them) and how these reforms will protect us from society-wide crises in the future.
If you know of any such proposals, please refer to them in the comments. I am generally familiar with proposals from "the libertarian left ", but am not aware of anything that would specifically address the current problems.
Radicals, this is your chance: get ready!
- adam ricketson's diary
- Login or register to post comments

Comments :
economic/legal rather than political
I think it is important to focus on economic and legal reforms, rather than broad political reforms. This is because most people live in the economic and legal worlds, and only deal with the political world in an abstract manner.
If we find that certain legal/economic reforms are incompatible with the existing political system, then we could move onto discussions of reforming the political system.
"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." --Frederick Douglas
lifestyle radicalism
A crisis like the one w may face can often be fertile grounds for lifestyle movements, which treat economic and legal structures as secondary for their goal of reform. Among these I would place Christian and communist movements, both because they only achieve social change as a result of pretty deep changes in the perspectives of individuals.
These are legitimate issues for discussion, but I think the issue of economic organization is secondary to their spiritual issues, so a discussion of these movements would be a bit tangental to the topic I'm interested in.
"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." --Frederick Douglas
Democratic Socialism
Probably the strongest radical movement in Western society is Democratic Socialism...which is kissing cousins with welfare liberalism. Both may treat the issue of personal investments (food, shelter, healthcare, education) in the same manner--namely that the government set up an institution to assure everyone some basic level of access.
The difference lies in how they deal with commercial/industrial investment -- the socialists would have this run by government bureacrats with a high degree of central oversight while the liberals would rely on entrepreneurs and markets to structure these investments.
There's been extensive debate on these topics, and the socialist model is typically challenged on the basis that it leads to economic stagnation (no entrepreneual reward, difficulty in assessing resource value) and corruption (political appointees in high positions).
"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." --Frederick Douglas
Individualist anarchism
Another radical tradition is individualist anarchism (Benjamin Tucker being a big influence in it--here's his critique of "state socialism"
). I'm generally sympathetic to this view, though I can't forumulate concrete proposals for our current situation. I view this sytem as being more "modular" than our current cosmpolitian economic system (illustrated by the minarchist-libertarian ideal), which I think would protect against financial/economic contagion, corruption and confidence scams, but might interfere with the optimal allocation of investment capital.
"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." --Frederick Douglas